• Home
  • Publications & grants
  • Playful Methods Lab
  • Teaching
  • Blog
  Phil Jones, Geographer

The INTERMITTENTLY updated blog

Call for papers AAG 2017: Mobile bodies, technologies and methods: critical perspectives

8/22/2016

0 Comments

 
A variety of technologies have emerged in the last decade that make it easier and cheaper than ever before to make representations of everyday mobile embodiment.  Increasing numbers of people are quantifying and self-tracking their everyday lives recording behavioural, biological and environmental data (Beer, 2016; Neff & Nafus, 2016) using a variety of technologies, for example:
  • lightweight wearable cameras such as the GoPro allowing users to record footage of their most banal everyday activities; 
  • devices such as the Fitbit and Apple Watch bringing  continuous physiological monitoring out of the medical realm and into mainstream culture;
  • apps like Strava allowing people to quantify their cycling, running and walking activities;
  • lightweight devices for measuring brain activity (EEG) and stimulation (EDA) becoming sufficiently robust and discreet to be used in non-lab environments. 
None of the underlying technologies are novel, but as they are made accessible in cheaper and more user-friendly packages, new techniques and sources of data are becoming more readily available for geographical analysis. Engagement with these technologies has created a rapidly expanding area of investigation within geography.
 
The emergence of the quantified-self poses both opportunities and dilemmas for geographical thought.  We wish to move past simplistic protests that dismiss such technology as offering another take on Haraway’s (1988) ‘god trick’, presenting partial, and highly situated data as objective truth.  Instead, this session will build on the potential identified by Delyser and Sui (2013) to take more inventive approaches toward mobile methods.  The focus will be on how these technologies can be engaged with by critical geographers to bring new perspectives to their analysis of everyday embodiment.  Themes include, but are not limited to:
  • Bringing physiological data into dialogue with qualitative perspectives
  • Hacking and repurposing different technologies and the data they generate
  • Technologically engaged embodied arts practice
  • Augmented and virtual realities
  • Biosensing and the sensory
  • Wearables beyond the quantified self
 
If you would be interested in submitting a paper or would like to discuss your ideas, please drop us a line informally in advance of the deadline.  Full abstracts of no more than 250 words to be submitted by 14 October to the session organisers Phil Jones ([email protected]) and Tess Osborne ([email protected]).
 
References
 
Beer D (2016) Metric power. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.
 
DeLyser D & Sui D (2013) Crossing the qualitative- quantitative divide II: inventive approaches to big data, mobile methods, and rhythmanalysis. Progress in Human Geography 37;2 293-305.
 
Haraway D (1988). Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies 14;3 575-599
 
Neff G & Nafas D (2016) Self-tracking. Cambridge MA., MIT Press.

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Phil Jones is a cultural geographer based at the University of Birmingham.

    Archives

    August 2024
    September 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    June 2022
    February 2022
    October 2021
    August 2021
    February 2021
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    August 2016
    June 2015
    March 2015
    August 2014
    May 2014
    February 2014
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home
  • Publications & grants
  • Playful Methods Lab
  • Teaching
  • Blog